Cirsium arvense

Class A Noxious Weed

This plant is new to the state and has been designated a Class A Noxious Weed by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture.
Read more >>>

Agricultural Threat

This plant threatens our state's food security and economy by reducing agriculture yields and/or degrading soil resources.
Read more >>>

Wildlife & Ecosystems

This plant is detrimental to native ecosystems, negatively impacting the quality of forage for wildlife and reducing biodiversity in plant communities.
Read more >>>

QUICK FACTS

  • Look out for this weed and don’t let it get established, because it’s very difficult to get rid of! Its expansive perennial root system spreads aggressively and spawns clones of itself, making it a nightmare for land managers across the world.
  • It is allelopathic; it fills the soil with toxins, making it inhospitable to other plants. It degrades soil health over time.
  • Its root system can reach 15 ft underground and an equal horizontal spread. Most direct management tools involve working with aboveground parts, so controlling a large infestation is a difficult and lengthy process.
  • Native thistles are an important part of our ecosystem and a crucial food source for wildlife. Please protect them by learning to differentiate between Canada thistle and our rare and beneficial thistles. See Identification to learn more.

1. Overview

family
Asteraceae– daisies & sunflowers
origin
Eurasia
life cycle
Perennial
other names
Many; creeping thistle, corn thistle, field thistle

Meet the posterchild of noxious weeds! This invasive thistle has been a thorn in the side of landowners and farmers for centuries. Canada thistle was one of the targets of our nation’s very first noxious weed laws, and today is classified as a noxious weed in all 50 states.

Canada thistle is a tenacious and invasive weed that poses a significant threat to New Mexico’s landscapes and agriculture. Known for its sharp spines and extensive root system, this noxious weed can quickly take over pastures, fields, and even your backyard. Not only does it crowd out native plants and crops, but its deep spreading root system makes it exceptionally difficult to eradicate. It’s crucial to understand the impact of Canada thistle and the importance of early detection and control to protect your property and preserve New Mexico’s natural beauty.

History of Canada Thistle

Canada thistle, a perennial menace, has a storied history of wreaking havoc since its introduction to North America in the 1600s. It is one of the oldest agricultural pests, and has gained a variety of loving nicknames over the years, such as “devil’s thistle” and “lettuce-from-hell”.

Native to the Eurasian regions of the Mediterranean and Asia, as well as Northern Africa, C. arvense evolved in the agricultural waste of the early inhabitants of these regions. It specialized to grow in waste areas, organic residues, and fallow lands. It was in these areas of neglect that this plant adapted its troublesome spreading techniques, which have enabled its expansive reach across the world. Today, it is thought to have the largest range of any thistle.

It was first identified as an invasive plant in North America in the 17th century, in French Canadian territories where temperatures are cooler, but it was only a matter of time before it made its way into the southern latitudes, adapting to this new continent and its environments with each encroachment.

Botanists in these early days underestimated the aggressive and pernicious nature of this weed, relying on incomplete knowledge and assumptions. Many prominent botanists of the time engaged in the pervasive belief that Canada thistle simply did not produce seed at all. For a long time, people were not worried about its spread due to the idea that it did not seem to ‘seed’ (Hayden 1933). This common belief was not corrected until the 1920’s, when the dioecious nature of this plant was first reported. This lack of reliable information meant Canada thistle was allowed to spread unabated for decades. The situation would eventually be amended as its impact on agriculture and native ecosystems became untenable.

The first weed outlaw
With growing consensus about its detrimental economic impact on agriculture, Canada thistle found itself in the crosshairs of state legislatures. In 1795, the state of Vermont enacted the first noxious weed law in our country, specifically to fight the spread of Canada thistle. In the early 1900’s, the currently named Noxious Weed Act gave people the right to “eradicate Canada thistle wherever it occurred, without fear of trespassing” (Jacobs, 2006). By 1846, 21 out of the existing 25 states that enacted weed laws targeted Canada thistle; today, all 50 states do so. While the original text of many of these early laws is not readily available, the first noxious weed law of the state of Iowa, enacted in 1868, reads as follows:

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Iowa, that if any resident owner of any land in this state after having been notified in writing of the presence of Canada thistles on his or her premises, shall permit them or any part of the root to blossom or mature, he or she shall be liable to a fine of five dollars and cost of collection for each offense. (April, 1868)

This invasive species has relentlessly spread across the United States, leaving a trail of agricultural and environmental destruction in its wake. In the Southwest, including New Mexico, Canada thistle’s aggressive growth and resilient root system have displaced native plants, reduced crop yields, and complicated land management. Its persistent presence over centuries underscores the critical need for vigilant control and management to protect our ecosystems and agricultural lands.

2. Identification

What does it look like?

Despite relying primarily on clonal reproduction, Canada thistle has a high degree of genetic variation between localized populations, making it difficult to reach universal descriptions. For the purposes of this guide, we are focusing on the features that distinguish it from other types thistles, but be aware individual plants may not all conform to the images/descriptions offered here. Having trouble identifying a weed? Contact us.

Key Features

  • Flowers: C. arvense is dioecious, so the male and female flowers are found on separate plants; this distinguishes it from many other thistles (both native and invasive) that have both sets of organs in each individual plant. Flowers typically smaller than other invasive thistles, less than 1 inch in diameter and typically grow in clusters of 1-5
  • Rosettes: Fairly weak rosette base with few, if any leaves. Compared to other thistles, leaves on basal rosettes of C. arvense are more tall and erect as opposed to laying flat along the ground. Rosettes from seed have dull green, relatively thick, rounded-oval to oblong cotyledons (seed leaves); clonal rosettes sprouted from the root lack these cotyledons (See images below).
  • Leaves: Leaf shape varies greatly. Some display deep lobes, while some are narrow and thin. Like other thistles, the leaf margins are lined with spikes; on Canada thistle, the spikes are relatively fine and evenly spaced, does not tend to form large thorns. Upper surface is usually dark green, and smooth or slightly hairy; underside is lighter in color and covered with fine, white hairs.
  • Stems: Erect, smooth or slightly hairy, typically with no spines. Often ridged, sometimes pinstriped purple or red due to disease or genetic variation. Shape can vary, but is almost always branching. Stems 18-48 inches tall, plants typically reach a height of 3-5 ft tall, though taller patches can form.
  • Seeds: Tiny achenes; become “plumed” when mature, similar to dandelion seeds.

3. Infestation Basics

“Of the various agents by which Canada thistle is introduced, man is foremost.”

– Ada Hayden, 1933

Why is it so invasive?

Canada thistle is particularly aggressive due to its creeping root system, from which it sprouts clones, and due to the ease with which its tiny seeds transported as crop contaminants or on vehicles and equipment.

Canada thistle plants emerge in two possible ways:

  1. Vegetative spread: given a proper growth medium, it can start cloning itself from nearly any root tissues, including by extending out horizontally from its root system, from subterranean stem tissue, or even from root fragments as tiny as 0.2 grams (about the length of a pinky fingernail, or about 1/4th of an inch) in length.
  2. Reproductive spread: new plants grown from seed; viable seeds require the presence of both male and female plants for cross-pollination to occur; they are primarily pollinated by honey bees and are not wind-pollinated. New plants grown from seed develop their root systems quickly, and can start sprouting root clones of their own within the first year. Seeds are weakly wind-propelled and tend to land close to the mother plant, resulting in a characteristic circle-spread pattern. Canada thistle seeds spread into new regions primarily as contaminants in crop seed and as travelers on vehicles and equipment, though laws and regulations seek to stem this vector of invasive seeds. Learn how to prevent the spread of invasive seeds.

By leveraging both of these reproductive methods, Canada thistle colonies can rapidly extend over large areas; one plant can colonize an area 3 to 6 feet in diameter in just one or two years. Of the two, vegetative spread is much more common and problematic, often resulting in thickets composed of clones of the same sex (all female plants or all male plants).

Stemming reproduction from seed is relatively straight-forward and focuses on preventing the formation of seed by mowing, cultivation, or cutting off the buds. However, any direct management such as these have the potential of triggering the plant to sprout new root clones. Anytime the plant is stressed, and especially when root fragments are severed, it speeds up the production of new rosettes from the root system, thoroughly complicating the task of managing for this weed.

Key takeaway: Once Canada thistle is established, it is most important to exhaust the root system while avoiding directly disturbing it as this could further spread the infestation. On uninfested lands, preventing the spread of new seedlings is key.

Where does it grow and how does it spread?

Cirsium arvense is a common invader of agricultural soils of all kinds. It has evolved to exploit the organic residues left behind after cultivation or disturbance, so it especially targets fallow fields, pastures, garden beds, hedgerows, or otherwise “neglected” lands. Areas with organic waste or compost residues are also at risk.

This plant requires long days and full sunlight; it does not tolerate shade very well, and thus prefers open fields and pastures over forested landscapes. It thrives best in areas with abundant water supplies, but requires well-draining soils; its root system is intolerant of water-logging (as most non-wetland plants are). Water catchments and irrigated areas are common hosts of Canada thistle infestation.

All that being said, it is at this point well adapted to a wide variety of environments and conditions. According the Forest Service, it is found in meadows, pastures, disturbed forests, restoration sites, roadsides, and more. It rarely finds its way to undisturbed forests, and is not typically successful in such sites. However, the Forest Service does indicate that it is an issue in disturbed pinyon-juniper forests in the Southwest.

Key takeaway: While Canada thistle is adapted to a variety of conditions, it loves agricultural soils that have been neglected or overdisturbed, as it thrives in full sunlight and organic residues.

Common risk factors for invasion

  • Human activity: Canada thistle thrives in areas where the soil has been disturbed, such as construction sites, agricultural fields, roadsides, and other places where the natural vegetation has been disrupted. These disturbances create openings in the soil that allow the plant to become established in the first place. Additionally, movement of soil, agricultural products, and equipment can inadvertently introduce Canada thistle to new areas.
  • Areas of neglect: Canada thistle is most likely to go unnoticed within neglected or poorly managed areas; the edges of fields, especially on fallow land, and wherever waste residues (such as compost or organic matter) accumulate are vulnerable. Practices such as overgrazing, lack of crop rotation, and inadequate weed control increase vulnerability to invasion.
    • This risk can be mitigated by practices that move cattle around more frequently such as rotational grazing.
  • Open spaces: Open sites with long days of full sunlight availability and little to no canopy are at risk for particularly aggressive infestations; pastures, pastures, fields, open grazing allotments, etc.
  • Moisture availability: While Canada thistle has adapted to a wide range of soil and water conditions, it does generally requires adequate moisture to establish and spread, making irrigated lands and areas with consistent rainfall particularly vulnerable. Permanent waterlogging will kill the plant, so infestations are more pernicious on sites with well-draining soil.

Impacts

Agriculture and Food Security

This invasive weed easily outcompetes field crops such as alfalfa, canola, and winter and spring wheat for vital resources like sunlight, nutrients, and water. Its rapidly spreading root system quickly establishes dense stands that crowd out valuable crops; field infestations can reach densities of 173 shoots per square meter, severely impacting the space available for crop production. Yield losses can range from 25% to almost 50% depending on the crop (McClay, 2002). Additionally, Canada thistle serves as a host for other major agricultural pests, such as bean aphid, sod-web worm (which attacks corn), and stalk insects that damage tomatoes.

Canada thistle is also a major challenge for pastures and grazing lands. While some livestock can be trained to consume the rosettes as a management strategy, it is generally unpalatable and unattractive as forage due to its spines (Davis et al., 2018). Dense infestations can even injure animals, leading to infections, further deterring its use by livestock. The result is that livestock will selectively graze around the thistles, further facilitating its dominance on pastures (Michigan Dept. of Nat. Res., 2018).

In summary, farmers and ranchers face increased costs associated with managing this weed, including expenses for herbicides, additional labor, and mechanical control measures. Furthermore, Canada thistle can harbor pests and diseases that may affect crops, exacerbating the threat to food production. The economic burden on farmers and the potential for decreased food supply contribute to the overall negative impact on food security in the region.

Soil Degradation

We’ve discussed the threat that Canada thistle poses to agriculture by competing for resources and reducing land productivity. In addition to those direct threats, Canada thistle also poses indirect threats to agriculture and natural resource conservation on the landscape by negatively impacting the quality of our soil.

Canada thistle contributes to soil degradation in New Mexico by altering the natural soil composition and structure. It is known to be an allelopathic plant, which means that it exudes chemicals into the soil that are toxic to surrounding plants. Long term infestations can result in soil with significantly reduced fertility, making it much more difficult for other plants to grow.

This plant also uses large amounts of water, gradually drying out the soil and increasing its erosion potential. While its root system can be quite extensive, it is somewhat brittle and concentrated primarily in the shallow layer of soil, making it less effective at holding onto soil over time compared to other plants. Soil erosion not only reduces soil fertility but also affects water quality in nearby water bodies, as eroded soil particles can carry nutrients and pollutants into streams and rivers. Additionally, the dense growth of Canada thistle can hinder the regeneration of native vegetation, leading to long-term soil health issues and further degradation.

Native Ecosystems and Biodiversity

The invasion of Canada thistle poses a significant threat to native ecosystems in New Mexico, including to our rare and endemic thistles.

This aggressive weed outcompetes native plants for resources, and given its tendency to form dense monocultures, it reduces biodiversity and disrupts the balance of native plant communities in large areas; this results in heavily degraded habitat for wildlife, including pollinators that depend on a variety of flowering plants. Invasions of this plant will overcrowd and outcompete almost any native forb community. Unlike many native plants, new shoots can develop in early spring through late fall, giving it an unfairly long growing season. Attempts to remove the extensive roots will inevitably leave fragments behind, which will aggressively repopulate before native species can get established (USDA, 2014).

The threat is especially pronounced for our native thistles. New Mexico is home to a variety of rare native thistle plants, many of which can easily be confused with noxious thistles like C. arvense. Native thistles are beautiful, unique, and important components to regional ecosystems, such as providing food for flocks of songbirds and pollinators, as well as serving as hosts for endangered butterflies and moths. While Canada thistle and other exotic thistles can provide some of these services, they do so in a diminished capacity and cannot cover all of the needs that our native varieties do.

The Xerces Society provides the following summary:

As with so many of our other native prairie and meadow species, thistles have been a direct casualty of habitat loss […] Most significantly, the invasion of non-native thistles and the lack of discernment between superficially similar native and invasive species is heralding the potential end of these beautiful and important plants. A number of native thistles are now threatened with extinction.
In fact, in response to the spread of exotic invasives such as Canada thistle (C. arvense), expansive biocontrol programs have released alien thistle-eating insects that devour invasive and native thistles alike. These biological control efforts have had only limited impacts on some invasive thistles, but likely devastating impacts on our native ones. This pressure has been compounded by farm-level thistle eradication efforts, including the ever-increasing use of herbicides. And, finally, some broad-reaching weed control policies treat all members of the genus as noxious weeds, ignoring the potential to push historically common native thistles toward local extinction.

The displacement of native species can result in cascading effects throughout the ecosystem, affecting the entire food web, from birds to elk, and even us (See Agricultural impacts above). Moreover, Canada thistle’s rapid spread and establishment in natural areas make it difficult to control, necessitating ongoing management efforts. The long-term presence of this invasive species can fundamentally alter ecosystem functions and reduce the resilience of native habitats, making them more susceptible to other environmental stressors, such as drought, pests, and wildfires. Due to the potential impact to native thistles, it is of utmost important to properly identify Canada thistle and to evaluate our management efforts carefully in order to protect our natural resources.

4. Management Strategies

As a perennial thistle, it is most important to address the spread of the underground root system. Root systems can spread very rapidly across a large area and can reach deep in the soil; for that reason, prevention is the best approach.

New plants can sprout from small fragments of root, so consider carefully before disturbing the area where the plant is growing. Any disturbance (such as fire, grazing, or even hand-pulling) that damages the root or stresses the plant has the potential to stimulate its growth through root germination.

The root system acts as a storage for energy throughout the dormant season. When dealing with established infestations, the best approach is to deplete its stored energy through repeated, frequent disturbance, such as multiple rounds of mowing. Persistence is key; if energy stores are not depleted, management attempts may actually wind up making the situation worse.

DO’s

  • properly ID the plant and any rosettes before attempting to manage; native thistles are an important part of our ecosystem and can look very similar to C. arvense
  • exhaust nutrient reserves by repeatedly stressing plant over several growing season
  • communicate with neighbors and businesses about the presence of this weed and take care not to transport seeds to new locations

DON’Ts

  • wait until the infestation has spread to a large area; prevention and early detection are the best management strategies
  • cultivate or hand-pull the plant, as any small fragments left behind will help spread the infestation
  • rely on a single management strategy; combining multiple approaches is necessary to combat Canada thistle

** The following information is provided courtesy of the UC Weed Research and Information Center. The Taos Soil and Water Conservation District does not endorse the use of any particular product, brand, or application thereof. **

Quick summary of managing Canada thistle using non-chemical methods.

Mowing
Mowing can be used to reduce the nutrient storage in the roots and suppress flower formation. However, for mowing to be effective it must be repeated at least every 3 to 4 weeks over several growing seasons or coupled with other control practices.
Tilling/Hand-pulling, etc
**NOT RECOMMENDED** Tillage or cultivation can actually increase Canada thistle because it breaks the root system into fragments, spreading the roots through the soil and stimulating development of new plants. Small root pieces have enough stored reserves to develop new plants. Small roots can survive at least 100 days without nutrient replenishment from photosynthesis. For cultivation to be effective it must be repeated at 21 day intervals throughout the growing season.

 

Grazing

Since Canada thistle spreads primarily via expanding its root system, grazing of above ground forage has not been proved to be an effective reduction strategy.

However, livestock can be trained to eat Canada thistle; while it will not do anything to prevent root spread, properly timed grazing can be used to reduce seed prooduction by preventing flower formation.

Prescribed burns
Canada thistle is adapted to survive fire and to take over recently burned areas, so burns are not recommended as a control strategy.

 

Please Be Aware: biocontrol agents are living organisms; they do not differentiate between different types of thistles. Some of these biocontrol agents can go on to become invasive species in their own right as they form outbreaks within crucial native thistles.

The following insects have been released as biocontrol agents, but none of these species have had a significant impact on Canada thistle.

Ceutorhynchus litura
The larvae of the Canada thistle stem weevil (Ceutorhynchus litura) bore into the main leaf vein and then into the crown. It is considered the most effective of the current biocontrol agents, reducing plant vigor. When present in high enough densities it can kill the plant.
Larinus planus
Larvae of the bud weevil (Larinus planus) feed on the bud and can reduce the potential for sexual reproduction.
Urophora cardui
Larvae of the thistle stem gall fly (Urophora cardui) bore into the apical meristem of shoots and form a gall. They can reduce plant vigor and can prevent flower formation depending upon the location of the gall.
Puccinia punctiformis
A pathogenic rust (Puccinia punctiformis) infects Canada thistle (mix sap from infected plant with water and spray uninfected plants to infect them), but it too has not had a significant effect on its control.

 

Information regarding chemical management strategies for this plant has been provided by the UC Weed Research and Information Center.

“The following specific use information is based on published papers and reports by researchers and land managers. Other trade names may be available, and other compounds also are labeled for this weed. Directions for use may vary between brands; see label before use. Herbicides are listed by mode of action and then alphabetically. The order of herbicide listing is not reflective of the order of efficacy or preference.”

2,4-D
(Several brand names)
  • Rate: 2 qt product/acre (1.9 lb a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence in spring at the pre-bud to early bud stage.
  • Remarks: Control with 2,4-D alone is only temporary; therefore, it is commonly mixed with other growth regulator herbicides. Research from Colorado showed control from a spring 2,4-D application followed by fall application with different herbicides. 2,4-D is broadleaf-selective and has no soil activity. Do not apply ester formulation when outside temperatures exceed 80°F.
Aminocyclopyrachlor +
chlorsulfuron
(Perspective)
  • Rate: 4.75 to 8 oz product (Perspective)/acre
  • Timing: Postemergent to plants before they produce seed.
  • Remarks: Perspective provides broad-spectrum control of many broadleaf species. Although generally safe to grasses, it may suppress or injure certain annual and perennial grass species. Do not treat in the root zone of desirable trees and shrubs. May need retreatment for 1 to 2 additional years. Do not apply more than 11 oz product/acre per year. At this high rate, cool-season grasses will be damaged, including bluebunch wheatgrass. Not yet labeled for grazing lands. Add an adjuvant to the spray solution. This product is not approved for use in California and some counties of Colorado (San Luis Valley).
Aminopyralid
(Milestone)
  • Rate: 5 to 7 oz product/acre (1.25 to 1.75 oz a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence in spring after all plants have fully emerged (some may be budding) until the oldest plants are in full flower stage. Use the higher rate when applying to flowering plants. Applications are also effective in fall before a killing frost. Use higher rates for older/dense stands or for longer residual control.
  • Remarks: May need retreatment for 1 to 2 additional years. Aminopyralid is one of the most effective herbicides for the control of Canada thistle. It is safe on grasses, although preemergence application at high rates can greatly suppress invasive annual grasses, such as medusahead. Aminopyralid has a longer residual and higher activity than clopyralid. Other members of the Asteraceae and Fabaceae are very sensitive to aminopyralid.
    Other premix formulations of aminopyralid can also be used for Canada thistle control. These include Opensight (aminopyralid + metsulfuron; 2.5 to 3 oz product/acre) and Forefront HL (aminopyralid + 2,4-D; 1.5 to 2.1 pt product/acre), both applied at the rosette to bolting stages. The formulation with metsulfuron is not registered for use in California.
Clopyralid
(Transline)
  • Rate: 0.67 to 1.33 pt product/acre (4 to 8 oz a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence before the bud stage when most of the basal leaves have emerged. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: One or more treatments per season may be needed for 1 to 3 consecutive years for complete control. Allow at least 20 days after application before disturbing treated areas. While clopyralid is very safe on grasses, it will injure many members of the Asteraceae, particularly thistles, and can also injure legumes, including clovers. Most other broadleaf species and all grasses
    are not injured. Also applied in a premix with triclopyr (Redeem, 2.5 to 4 pt product/acre) to rosette to bud stage Canada thistle.
Dicamba
(Banvel)
  • Rate: 4 pt product/acre (2 lb a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence to rosettes. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: Dicamba is a broadleaf-selective herbicide often combined with other active ingredients. It is not typically used alone to control Canada thistle because it is not as effective as other
    herbicides such as aminopyralid, clopyralid or aminocyclopyrachlor.
    Dicamba is available mixed with diflufenzopyr in a formulation called Overdrive. This has been reported to be effective on Canada thistle. Diflufenzopyr is an auxin transport inhibitor which
    causes dicamba to accumulate in shoot and root meristems, increasing its activity. Overdrive is applied postemergence at 4 to 8 oz product/acre to rapidly growing plants. Higher rates should be used when treating perennial weeds. Add a non-ionic surfactant to the treatment solution at 0.25% v/v or a methylated seed oil at 1% v/v solution.
Picloram
(Tordon 22K)
  • Rate: 2 pt product/acre (8 oz a.e./acre).
  • Timing: Best when applied postemergence to rapidly growing thistle after most leaves emerge but before bud stage. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: Picloram gives a broader spectrum of control than aminopyralid, aminocyclopyrachlor, and clopyralid, and has much longer soil residual activity. Most broadleaf plants are susceptible. Although well-developed grasses are not usually injured by labeled use rates, some applicators have noted that young grass seedlings with fewer than four leaves may be killed. Do not apply near trees. Tordon 22K is a federally restricted use pesticide. Picloram is not registered for use in
    California.
Glyphosate
(Roundup, Accord XRT II, others)
  • Rate: Broadcast foliar treatment: 2 qt product (Roundup ProMax)/acre (2.25 lb a.e./acre). Spot treatment: 2% v/v solution
  • Timing: Postemergence to rapidly growing thistles when most plants are past the bud stage. Fall applications must be before the first killing frost.
  • Remarks: Do not tank-mix other herbicides with glyphosate for thistle control. More than 1 year of treatment may be necessary for complete control. Glyphosate will only provide control during the year of application; it has no soil activity and will not kill seeds or inhibit germination the following season. Glyphosate is nonselective. To achieve selectivity, it can be applied using a wiper or spot treatment to control current year’s plants.
Chlorsulfuron
(Telar)
  • Rate: 1 to 1.33 oz product/acre (0.75 to 1 oz a.i./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence from bolting to bloom stages. Can also apply in fall.
  • Remarks: Chlorsulfuron has mixed selectivity on both broadleaf and grass species but is generally safe on most grasses. It has fairly long soil residual activity. The herbicide solution requires constant agitation during application.
Imazapyr
(Arsenal, Habitat, Stalker, Chopper, Polaris)
The herbicide label indicates that 4 to 6 pt product/acre gives some level of control, but imazapyr is not usually the herbicide of choice for the control of Canada thistle.
Sulfometuron
(Oust and others)
  • Rate: 6 to 8 oz product/acre (4.5 to 6 oz a.i./acre)
  • Timing: Apply preemergence or early postemergence before or during the rainy season when weeds are germinating or actively growing.
  • Remarks: Sulfometuron has mixed selectivity. It can cause minor damage to some native perennial grasses and has a fairly long soil residual. Higher rates may increase control but will also give more bare ground. Requires 20 inches of annual rainfall or more for effective preemergence control.

NMSU’s Extension Weed Specialist Dr. Leslie Beck on Canada thistle

This video is specific to Canada thistle in Taos County and was the result of a collaboration between Taos Soil & Water Conservation District and New Mexico State University.

6. References & Further Reading

References

Further Reading