Ulmus pumila

Class C Noxious Weed

This plant is widespread in the state and has been designated a Class C Noxious Weed by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture.
Read more >>>

Riparian Threat

This plant is known to invade riparian areas or otherwise damage the health and abundance of our water resources.
Read more >>>

QUICK FACTS

  • Siberian elm is a hardy, fast-spreading weed commonly planted for its ability to tolerate marginal conditions and quick provision of shade.
  • It is a drain on local water resources; it hogs available soil moisture for itself, but sweats it out profusely during high temperatures.
  • Siberian elm contributes to loss of biodiversity, as it limits the amount of water available for other plants, resulting in an overall drier, harsher environment.
  • The roots and limbs of this hardy tree are common causes of property and structural damage; its roots can crack pipes and concrete, and its decaying limbs can fall from 70+ feet in the air.
  • Once established, it is very difficult to remove! Even after cutting it down, this tree can resprout from root suckers or from the cut stump itself.

1. Overview

family
Ulmaceae– elms
origin
Eurasian – Russia, Mongolia, Korea
life cycle
Perennial
other names
chinese elm (misnomer), asiatic elm, dwarf elm

Love it or hate it, this tree is everywhere! Once popular as a landscape and ornamental tree, the Siberian elm is now a controversial fixture across New Mexican towns.

Far from its start in our nation as a purported miracle tree, Siberian elm inspires a mix of frustration and reticent appreciation from most folks today. Aside from its detrimental effects on native ecosystems and water resources, in many areas it has become a nuisance due to its prolific seeding and aggressive spread. Even where it was intentionally planted, many homeowners today are saddled with the labor and costs of removing this tenacious tree.

History of Siberian Elm

  • Originally from the Manchurian region, from eastern Russia down towards Korea. Its native landscape reminds us of the driest parts of our state.
  • Introduced as ornamental in 1860s.
  • Ecological similarities lead to its success in the the US, especially in the West, where it was able to exploit its niche without the mediating influences of its native environment
  • Farmers planted as single-row windbreaks in 1960s in response to the Dust Bowl.
    • Former New Mexico Gov. Clyde Tingley found a solution to the shadeless, drought-prone corridors of his city in a Mongolian plant. Native to the Gobi Desert, it could thrive even when water was scarce.
    • The Governor handed out the wrinkled, dime-sized seeds of Siberian elm trees to anyone who would plant them.
  • This echoes a pattern of settlers coming to the west, promising to “green up the place” and giving away fast-growing plants like the Siberian elm to the populace.
    • This trend continues in the early days of the railroad, with the advent of nurseries as a new vector of distribution. The siberian elm was treated as a panacea to address what the people at the time perceived as the problems inherent in the western landscape. [Old timey adverts Chinese elm-miracle tree!]
  • They grew fast and hardily, and by the 1970s, the trees had spread throughout the state.
    • How and when was ecological damage recognized? When and how did it become a problem for people?

2. Identification

What does it look like?

Siberian elm is often mis-identified as “Chinese elm”, though these are different plants; Siberian elm’s is dark and furrowed, while Chinese elm has a smooth, splotchy bark. It’s also possible to mistake the young seedlings for our native alders (Alnus spp.); note that the Siberian elm’s leaves are always strictly alternate (see below), while alders are more unevenly arranged. Having trouble identifying a weed? Contact us.

Key Features

  • Tree or shrub – given the opportunity, it can grow up to 70ft tall
  • Highly branching with an open crown; branches grow upwards, and are flexible but brittle and may easily break off as the tree ages; usually a build-up of leaves and woody debris can be found under mature Siberian elms
  • Leaves: alternate on the branch, almond-shaped and tapered into a point at the end; leaf margins are mildly serrated or toothed
      • Deciduous: the foliage changes color with the seasons, from green in the spring to yellow in the fall, and then shedding them entirely in the winter cold. Brown leaves are also possible, a sign of elm beetle infestation
  • The tree is monoecious, which means each individual produces both seeds and pollen.
      • Flowers: tiny and inconspicuous, showing up as small reddish-brown clusters of 3-15 flowers on the previous year’s new branches.
      • Seeds: Papery, flat, light green to yellow in color; main seed is encased in between translucent “wings” called samara

3. Infestation Basics

“Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida.”

– Name, Source

Why is it so invasive?

Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida.​

Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi.

Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat.

Key takeaway: Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Where does it grow and how does it spread?

Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida.​

Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi.

Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat.

Key takeaway: Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

 

Common risk factors for invasion

  • Human activity: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent venenatis metus at tortor pulvinar varius. Nulla facilisi. Sed dignissim lacinia nunc. Curabitur tortor. Pellentesque nibh. Aenean quam. In scelerisque sem at dolor. Maecenas mattis. Sed convallis tristique sem. Proin ut ligula vel nunc egestas porttitor. Morbi lectus risus, iaculis vel, suscipit quis, luctus non, massa. Fusce ac turpis quis ligula lacinia aliquet.
  • Areas of neglect: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent venenatis metus at tortor pulvinar varius. Nulla facilisi. Sed dignissim lacinia nunc. Curabitur tortor. Pellentesque nibh. Aenean quam. In scelerisque sem at dolor. Maecenas mattis. Sed convallis tristique sem. Proin ut ligula vel nunc egestas porttitor. Morbi lectus risus, iaculis vel, suscipit quis, luctus non, massa. Fusce ac turpis quis ligula lacinia aliquet.
    • This risk can be mitigated by practices that move cattle around more frequently such as rotational grazing.
  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent venenatis metus at tortor pulvinar varius. Nulla facilisi. Sed dignissim lacinia nunc. Curabitur tortor. Pellentesque nibh. Aenean quam. In scelerisque sem at dolor. Maecenas mattis. Sed convallis tristique sem. Proin ut ligula vel nunc egestas porttitor. Morbi lectus risus, iaculis vel, suscipit quis, luctus non, massa. Fusce ac turpis quis ligula lacinia aliquet.
  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent venenatis metus at tortor pulvinar varius. Nulla facilisi. Sed dignissim lacinia nunc. Curabitur tortor. Pellentesque nibh. Aenean quam. In scelerisque sem at dolor. Maecenas mattis. Sed convallis tristique sem. Proin ut ligula vel nunc egestas porttitor. Morbi lectus risus, iaculis vel, suscipit quis, luctus non, massa. Fusce ac turpis quis ligula lacinia aliquet.

Impacts

Water Resources

Those of us who live in dry and desert areas understand the paramount importance of water: how we use it and how we share it determines how much will be available to go around. This is even more true when it comes to plants, and in this regard, Siberian elm is a bad neighbor: greedy and wasteful.

Most plants have evolved to close their leaves’ “pores” (called stomata) in response to drought conditions as a means to conserve water Siberian elm has developed a different adaptation not to conserve water, but to keep cool in the heat: it sweats! That’s right, when exposed to drought, instead of closing up its pores, Siberian elm actually releases more water from its leaves as evaporation – all while continuing to pull more water from the surrounding areas.

Compared to other trees, Siberian elm has a very shallow, but wide-spreading root system. While most tree roots grow deep so as to penetrate and recharge the aquifer beneath, Siberian elm concentrates its roots along the first 1-3 feet of soil. This is the depth at which most understory plants like grasses and flowers are able to grow, and so they are significantly disadvantaged when they grow near a Siberian elm; as the elm grows, its roots can rapidly displace nearby vegetation, and make it harder for new plants to reach enough space, moisture, nutrients for its own roots.

For a desert plant, Siberian elm is a prolific water user, in part due to the inefficiency with which it utilizes available moisture. What its root system lacks in depth, it more than makes up for in spread, with water uptake occurring well beyond the tree’s canopy. In many cases, a Siberian elm planted in one property will affect water availability and plant growth in the adjacent properties as well, with root systems spreading to a length equivalent to four times its height! [cite]

Infrastructure Issues

Despite their many issues, Siberian elms are still beloved for the visual appeal and shade they provide to otherwise barren areas, and as such are ubiquitous in New Mexico’s urban and even rural landscapes. Back in the day, Siberian elms were planted indiscriminately, resulting in some very unfortunate placements. The trees tend to quickly outgrow their surroundings, with little regard for whatever else happens to be nearby.

Arborists will often describe trees like the Siberian elm as a from of job security, as homeowners across the state struggle with the issues that come with harboring these trees. The roots and branches of this tree are very tough; they do not struggle to break through even concrete and pavement if given enough time. They are known to grow through sewage pipes, and to crack through even asphalt roads and paved sidewalks!

Mature Siberian elms in particular can become a hazard as they continue to grow, impacting infrastructure such as power lines, sewage and water pipes, etc. The tree routinely sheds off sections of its canopy that aren’t getting access to sunlight anymore; the branches are heavy but the wood itself is quite brittle, causing large branches to snap off quite easily. Falling from trees up to 70 ft in height, they can do quite a lot of damage to whatever is around.

It is unfortunate that many Siberian elms are planted right next to residential structures, power lines, and other critical infrastructure. The damage can be quite expensive to fix, as the tree is tenacious and may be difficult to eradicate.

Public Health

Everyone who lives in the vicinity of these trees is familiar with the copious piles of seeds they produce every year. Another unwelcome sign of this tree’s reproductive cycle is the pollen, which is responsible for many unpleasant symptoms in the spring and summer. Some folks are particularly sensitive to elms.

4. Management Strategies

Controlling Siberian elm spread is best accomplished when the trees are not yet sprouted or still in the seedling stage and can still be pulled by hand.  Once established, removal becomes progressively more difficult with age.  For best success, clean up the seeds, and pull those that germinate while they are still young.

 

DO’s

  • nunc ipsum est, aliquam eleifend est eu, luctus porttitor turpis
  • nam sed odio commodo, viverra lectus at, eleifend ex
  • risus a mattis efficitur, orci sapien lobortis est, eget elementum nisl nibh consectetur nisl

DON’Ts

  • nunc ipsum est, aliquam eleifend est eu, luctus porttitor turpis
  • nam sed odio commodo, viverra lectus at, eleifend ex
  • risus a mattis efficitur, orci sapien lobortis est, eget elementum nisl nibh consectetur nisl

** The following information is provided courtesy of the UC Weed Research and Information Center. The Taos Soil and Water Conservation District does not endorse the use of any particular product, brand, or application thereof. **

Quick summary of managing Siberian Elm using non-chemical methods.

Mowing
Add Content
Tilling/Hand-pulling, etc
Add Content

 

Grazing

Add Content

Prescribed burns
Add Content

 

Please be aware: biocontrol agents are living organisms; they do not differentiate between different types of thistles. Some of these biocontrol agents can go on to become invasive species in their own right as they form outbreaks within crucial native thistles.

Ceutorhynchus litura
Add Content
Larinus planus
Add Content
Urophora cardui
Add Content
Puccinia punctiformis
Add Content

 

Information regarding chemical management strategies for this plant has been provided by the UC Weed Research and Information Center.

“The following specific use information is based on published papers and reports by researchers and land managers. Other trade names may be available, and other compounds also are labeled for this weed. Directions for use may vary between brands; see label before use. Herbicides are listed by mode of action and then alphabetically. The order of herbicide listing is not reflective of the order of efficacy or preference.”

2,4-D
(Several brand names)
  • Rate: 2 qt product/acre (1.9 lb a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence in spring at the pre-bud to early bud stage.
  • Remarks: Control with 2,4-D alone is only temporary; therefore, it is commonly mixed with other growth regulator herbicides. Research from Colorado showed control from a spring 2,4-D application followed by fall application with different herbicides. 2,4-D is broadleaf-selective and has no soil activity. Do not apply ester formulation when outside temperatures exceed 80°F.
Aminocyclopyrachlor +
chlorsulfuron
(Perspective)
  • Rate: 4.75 to 8 oz product (Perspective)/acre
  • Timing: Postemergent to plants before they produce seed.
  • Remarks: Perspective provides broad-spectrum control of many broadleaf species. Although generally safe to grasses, it may suppress or injure certain annual and perennial grass species. Do not treat in the root zone of desirable trees and shrubs. May need retreatment for 1 to 2 additional years. Do not apply more than 11 oz product/acre per year. At this high rate, cool-season grasses will be damaged, including bluebunch wheatgrass. Not yet labeled for grazing lands. Add an adjuvant to the spray solution. This product is not approved for use in California and some counties of Colorado (San Luis Valley).
Aminopyralid
(Milestone)
  • Rate: 5 to 7 oz product/acre (1.25 to 1.75 oz a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence in spring after all plants have fully emerged (some may be budding) until the oldest plants are in full flower stage. Use the higher rate when applying to flowering plants. Applications are also effective in fall before a killing frost. Use higher rates for older/dense stands or for longer residual control.
  • Remarks: May need retreatment for 1 to 2 additional years. Aminopyralid is one of the most effective herbicides for the control of Canada thistle. It is safe on grasses, although preemergence application at high rates can greatly suppress invasive annual grasses, such as medusahead. Aminopyralid has a longer residual and higher activity than clopyralid. Other members of the Asteraceae and Fabaceae are very sensitive to aminopyralid.
    Other premix formulations of aminopyralid can also be used for Canada thistle control. These include Opensight (aminopyralid + metsulfuron; 2.5 to 3 oz product/acre) and Forefront HL (aminopyralid + 2,4-D; 1.5 to 2.1 pt product/acre), both applied at the rosette to bolting stages. The formulation with metsulfuron is not registered for use in California.
Clopyralid
(Transline)
  • Rate: 0.67 to 1.33 pt product/acre (4 to 8 oz a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence before the bud stage when most of the basal leaves have emerged. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: One or more treatments per season may be needed for 1 to 3 consecutive years for complete control. Allow at least 20 days after application before disturbing treated areas. While clopyralid is very safe on grasses, it will injure many members of the Asteraceae, particularly thistles, and can also injure legumes, including clovers. Most other broadleaf species and all grasses
    are not injured. Also applied in a premix with triclopyr (Redeem, 2.5 to 4 pt product/acre) to rosette to bud stage Canada thistle.
Dicamba
(Banvel)
  • Rate: 4 pt product/acre (2 lb a.e./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence to rosettes. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: Dicamba is a broadleaf-selective herbicide often combined with other active ingredients. It is not typically used alone to control Canada thistle because it is not as effective as other
    herbicides such as aminopyralid, clopyralid or aminocyclopyrachlor.
    Dicamba is available mixed with diflufenzopyr in a formulation called Overdrive. This has been reported to be effective on Canada thistle. Diflufenzopyr is an auxin transport inhibitor which
    causes dicamba to accumulate in shoot and root meristems, increasing its activity. Overdrive is applied postemergence at 4 to 8 oz product/acre to rapidly growing plants. Higher rates should be used when treating perennial weeds. Add a non-ionic surfactant to the treatment solution at 0.25% v/v or a methylated seed oil at 1% v/v solution.
Picloram
(Tordon 22K)
  • Rate: 2 pt product/acre (8 oz a.e./acre).
  • Timing: Best when applied postemergence to rapidly growing thistle after most leaves emerge but before bud stage. Fall applications are also effective.
  • Remarks: Picloram gives a broader spectrum of control than aminopyralid, aminocyclopyrachlor, and clopyralid, and has much longer soil residual activity. Most broadleaf plants are susceptible. Although well-developed grasses are not usually injured by labeled use rates, some applicators have noted that young grass seedlings with fewer than four leaves may be killed. Do not apply near trees. Tordon 22K is a federally restricted use pesticide. Picloram is not registered for use in
    California.
Glyphosate
(Roundup, Accord XRT II, others)
  • Rate: Broadcast foliar treatment: 2 qt product (Roundup ProMax)/acre (2.25 lb a.e./acre). Spot treatment: 2% v/v solution
  • Timing: Postemergence to rapidly growing thistles when most plants are past the bud stage. Fall applications must be before the first killing frost.
  • Remarks: Do not tank-mix other herbicides with glyphosate for thistle control. More than 1 year of treatment may be necessary for complete control. Glyphosate will only provide control during the year of application; it has no soil activity and will not kill seeds or inhibit germination the following season. Glyphosate is nonselective. To achieve selectivity, it can be applied using a wiper or spot treatment to control current year’s plants.
Chlorsulfuron
(Telar)
  • Rate: 1 to 1.33 oz product/acre (0.75 to 1 oz a.i./acre)
  • Timing: Postemergence from bolting to bloom stages. Can also apply in fall.
  • Remarks: Chlorsulfuron has mixed selectivity on both broadleaf and grass species but is generally safe on most grasses. It has fairly long soil residual activity. The herbicide solution requires constant agitation during application.
Imazapyr
(Arsenal, Habitat, Stalker, Chopper, Polaris)
The herbicide label indicates that 4 to 6 pt product/acre gives some level of control, but imazapyr is not usually the herbicide of choice for the control of Canada thistle.
Sulfometuron
(Oust and others)
  • Rate: 6 to 8 oz product/acre (4.5 to 6 oz a.i./acre)
  • Timing: Apply preemergence or early postemergence before or during the rainy season when weeds are germinating or actively growing.
  • Remarks: Sulfometuron has mixed selectivity. It can cause minor damage to some native perennial grasses and has a fairly long soil residual. Higher rates may increase control but will also give more bare ground. Requires 20 inches of annual rainfall or more for effective preemergence control.

NMSU’s Extension Weed Specialist Dr. Leslie Beck & ISA Certified Arborist Ben Wright on Siberian elm

This video is specific to Siberian elm in Taos County and was the result of a collaboration between Taos Soil & Water Conservation District and New Mexico State University. Special thanks to Ben Wright, vice-chair of the Taos Tree Board, for contributing his expertise on the topic as a featured guest.

6. References & Further Reading

References

  • Name. (year). Title. Publisher, vol(ch), pp. https://url

Further Reading

  • Author’s Last Name, Initial(s). (Year, Month Day of publication). Title of work. Website. https://URL
  • Author’s Last Name, Initial(s). (Year, Month Day of publication). Title of work. Website. https://URL